GIS 5007 - Computer Cartography: Module 1 - Map Critique
This
week’s lesson topic is about understanding map design principles by determining
and explaining the difference between a well-designed and poorly designed map
of personal choice.
For
my example of a well-designed map, I chose the thematic map example, below. The
theme of this map is to show what counties in South Carolina are a part of
which Wildlife Management Area Game Zones, 1 - 6. This map example has a clear
and neat esthetic allowing the reader to clearly understand the theme, data,
and visual interpretation of the map. This map includes the necessities: map
title, legend, scale bar, citations, neat boundaries, correct/neat symbology,
and clear qualitative and quantitative data. The
map is appropriately balanced without being overcrowded but we also do
not see any large white or empty spaces.
For my example of a poorly designed map, I
chose another thematic map example, below. This maps topic seems to be about
what sitcoms are most popular in major U.S. cities and/or states. However, I
could be wrong since this information displayed on this map isn't exactly clear
and descriptive. My first impression of this map was, "what is going on
here?" This map is remarkably busy, disorganized, no clear boundaries, and
no clear qualitative and quantitative data. This map lacks a clear
legend(s), symbols for clarity, clear boundaries, balance, symbology, scale
bar, and citations. If a correct legend was added to the map to clarify what
the data purpose is we could have more functionally out of this map.


Comments
Post a Comment